Analysis of R213R and 13494 g→a polymorphisms of the p53 gene in individuals with esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia of the cardia and Barrett’s Esophagus compared with a control group
Protein p53 is the tumor suppressor involved in cell cycle control and apoptosis. There are several polymorphisms reported for p53 which can affect important regions involved in protein tumor suppressor activity. Amongst the polymorphisms described, R213R and 13949 g→a are rarely studied, with an estimate frequency not yet available for the Brazilian population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the genotype and allele frequencies and associations of these polymorphisms in a group of patients with altered esophageal tissue from South Brazil and compare with the frequency observed for a control population. A total of 35 patients for R213R and 45 for 13494 g→a polymorphisms analysis with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms diagnosed by upper digestive endoscopy and confirmed by biopsy were studied. For both groups, 100 controls were used for comparison. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was also analyzed for a selected group of patients where normal and affected tissue was available. There was one patient with Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) showing LOH for R213R out of two heterozygous samples analyzed and two patients (esophagitis and BE) for 13494 g→a polymorphism. We also aimed to build a haplotype for both polymorphisms collectively analyzed with R27P polymorphism, previously reported by our group. There were no significant differences in allele and genotype distribution between patients and controls. Although using esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia of the cardia and BE samples, all non-neoplastic lesions, we can conclude that these sites do not represent genetic susceptibility markers for the development and early progression of GERD to BE and esophageal cancer. Additional studies are required in order to investigate other determiners of early premalignant lesions known to predispose to esophageal cancer.
Keywords
Polymorphismp53Esophagus
Introduction
Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) is a complication of the gastroesophageal reflux disease being an acquired premalignant disorder that predisposes to the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in 10% of the patients. It is also used as a model to investigate the order of genetic events in neoplastic progression (Audrézet et al. 1996).
The progressive evolution of the normal esophageal epithelium into the columnar-type epithelium in BE is characterized by a complex sequence of events beginning with inflammation of the normal squamous epithelium (esophagitis), resulting from chronic reflux, followed by intestinal metaplasia of the cardia (IMC) and BE, increasing levels of dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. This process is modulated by environmental stimuli and genetic predisposition that result in genomic instability. Cells with multiple developed genetic abnormalities result in cellular clones with acquired genetic errors. Some clones acquire proliferative advantage and may develop capacity for invasion, resulting in neoplasia (Blount et al. 1990).
Several studies have focused on the metaplasia-adenocarcinoma transition while little is still known with respect to molecular factors that contribute to the development of alterations preceding intestinal metaplasia (Reid et al. 1987; Rabinovitch et al. 1989; Reid et al. 1992). The activity of several genes has been used to pinpoint alterations in the progression that leads to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.
Neshat et al. (1994) described the molecular alterations related to esophagus neoplasia. Gene mutations in the tumor-suppressing p53 gene were the abnormalities most commonly reported. The incidence of mutations tends to increase with the metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma progression, ranging from rare in non-dysplastic epithelium to up to 90% in adenocarcinoma (Neshat et al. 1994; Fitzgerald 2005).
More than 90% of the mutations described for the p53 gene occur between exons 4 and 9, which encompass protein domains II-V. This region is evolutionarily highly conserved and involves the DNA-binding domain, essential for the activity of p53 (Donehower and Bradley 1993; Soussi 1996).
p53 gene mutations can damage its DNA-binding or transactivation functions, thereby inhibiting its key role in the cell cycle control. In the majority of these cases where the mutation is recessive, tumor cells often retained only the mutated allele and lose the wild type, while blood cells harbor both alleles. This loss is named loss of heterozygosity (LOH) (Baccouche et al. 2003).
Chromosomal regions with frequent LOH may point out those genes with higher susceptibility and help to understand the molecular events involved in carcinogenesis (Hu et al. 1999).
Mutations in tumor suppressor p53 gene have been detected in more than 25% of patients with Barrett’s metaplasia submitted to endoscopy and in more than 75% of Barrett’s adenocarcinomas (Aldulaimi and Jankowski 1999).
In addition to cancer-associated mutations, at least 200 polymorphisms have already been described at the p53 gene, both in coding and noncoding regions (IARC, NCI, NCBI, 2007), although most of them are located in introns outside the consensus region of splicing sites.
Studies indicate that the preferential polymorphic alleles of the gene may be involved with susceptibility and predisposition to cancer. (Soulitzis et al. 2002; Olschwang et al. 1991; Baccouche et al. 2003).
Among these, the polymorphism R213R in exon 6 and the polymorphism 13949 g→a in intron 6 are rarely studied, with an estimate frequency not yet available for the Brazilian population (IARC). The R213R polymorphism retains the arginine amino acid, the most frequent codon being CGA and the polymorphic, CGG. The polymorphism 13494 g→a shows adenine replacing guanine. No phenotypic differences were reported in both cases.
Our study aimed to estimate the frequency of R213R and 13494 g→a polymorphisms in control individuals, who represent the population of Porto Alegre, and in individuals with alterations in the esophageal tissue from the southernmost region of Brazil. In addition, we studied the potential association between the frequencies of this polymorphism in these two groups. The analysis of normal and altered tissue obtained from some of the patients allowed us to check for the existence of loss of heterozygosity in these regions of the gene. Furthermore, it also purports to build a haplotype for both polymorphisms collectively analyzed with the R27P polymorphism of exon 4 of the TP53, previously analyzed by our group (Leistner-Segal et al. 2006).
Materials and methods
Study design
This is a case control study designed to determine the relative frequency of three p53 polymorphisms in controls versus patients with GERD and complications such as BE. In addition, the study was designed to identify LOH at these loci in patients.
Patients and controls
A total of 35 patients (17 female and 18 male; ages ranging between 23 years and 82 years; average of 51.1 years) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms diagnosed by upper digestive endoscopy and confirmed by biopsy were analyzed for the R213R polymorphism, while for the 13494 g→a polymorphism analysis a total of 45 individuals (22 female and 23 male; ages ranging between 23 years and 82 years; average of 51.4 years) were used. The biopsies were analyzed according to Segal et al. 2004. For controls, 100 donor samples from Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre Blood Bank were analyzed. This project was approved by the Ethic Committee of HCPA (03191) and National Committee for Ethics and Research (7945). All procedures were performed with written informed consent of the patients.
DNA extraction
Ten milliliters of peripheral blood in EDTA was withdrawn from controls and patients and DNA was isolated using the salting out procedure described by Miller et al. (1988). In addition, tissue from the lesion site was obtained by biopsy at endoscopy from patients showing esophageal alterations. DNA extraction from tissue was performed freshly, carried out as previously described (Leistner-Segal et al. 2006). Because we did not perform laser microdissection in the affected tissue, it is possible that these samples may also contain cells carrying normal DNA.
Conditions for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
The long PCR technique of exons 5 to 8 of the p53 gene was set as standard. Hence, exon 5 forward (5′CTGCCCTGACTTTCAACTCTG3′) and exon 8 reverse (5′TGCACCCTTGGTCTCCTCCAC3′) primers were used, according to Segal et al. 2004 (31). Amplifications were carried out using approximately 200 ng DNA, 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen™), 5 μl enzyme buffer (Tris-HCl 200 mM, KCl 500 mM), 5 μl dNTP 0.2 mM (Invitrogen™), 1.5 μl MgCl2 (50 mM), and 1.0 μl of each specific primer at a concentration of 20 pmol for a final reaction volume of 50 μl.
PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min., followed by 35 cycles of 40 s, with 94°C of denaturation, 55°C of annealing and extension at 72°C, and final extension of 72°C for 10 min. The amplified fragment of 1619 pb was submitted to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized through ethidium bromide staining.
Digestion with restriction enzymes
R213R (exon 6) polymorphism: to identify the R213R polymorphism, digestion of the long PCR product was carried out using TaqI (New England BioLabs™) enzyme to cleave the T′CGA site, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The digestion used 10 μl of the PCR product and 2 U of the enzyme in a total final volume of 30 μl. The reaction was kept at 65°C in a thermocycler for 2 h and 30 min. Fragments resulting from cleavage of the PCR product with the TaqI enzyme are 385, 309 and 925 bp in the presence of the CGA sequence, and 694 and 925 bp in the presence of the CGG sequence.
13494 g→a (intron 6) polymorphism: to identify the 13494 g→a polymorphism, digestion on the long PCR product was carried out using the MspI (New England BioLabs™) enzyme to cleave the C′CGG site, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The digestion used 10 μl of the PCR product and 2 U of the enzyme in a total final volume of 30 μl. The reaction was incubated at 37°C in dry bath. Fragments resulting from cleavage of the PCR product with the MspI enzyme are 124, 356, 276, 299, 168, 276 and 120 bp in the presence of the CGG sequence, and 124, 632, 299, 168, 276 and 120 bp in the presence of the CAG sequence.
Both digestion products were subject to electrophoresis in 3% agarose gel. The band pattern found is visualized in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Agarose gel (3.0%) showing long PCR results and digestions carried out with TaqI and MspI. Position 8 shows the 100 bp molecular weight marker. Position 1 shows the long PCR product concerning exons 5 to 8 in the TP53. Positions 2, 3 and 4 show the allelic patterns AA and AG for the R213R polymorphism. Positions 5, 6 and 7 show the allelic patterns AA, AG and GG for the 13494 g→a polymorphism
The statistical analysis of results was performed using a Pearson’s chi-square test in the MedCalc™ software.
Loss of heterozygosity analysis
For this study, the DNA extracted from blood and affected tissue of the same patient was analyzed. Only individuals who presented a heterozygous pattern in their blood were considered (n = 2 for the R213R polymorphism and n = 12 for the 13494 g→a polymorphism), respectively 8% and 33% of the sample for each polymorphism.
Results
Clinical signs
All patients showed signs of GERD. For R213R polymorphism analysis, 20% (7/35) showed esophagitis, 37.1% (13/45) showed IMC and 42.9% (15/35) showed BE. For the 13494 g→a polymorphism, 27% (12/45) showed esophagitis, 37.8% (17/45) IMC and 35.6% (16/45) BE.
Long PCR technique standardization
The presented methodology proved to be adequate for amplification of a relatively long segment involving four significant exons for the p53 protein function, as shown in Fig. 1.
Identification of R213R (exon 6) polymorphism
In both groups of patients and controls a predominance of the allele (A) was noticed, with no homozygosis for the polymorphic allele (G) being reported. This was only found in heterozygosis in two individuals in the patients group and four in the control group, as shown on Table 1. The frequencies found for this polymorphism were notably similar in both groups, without significant difference for genotypic and allelic analysis (P = 0.958 and P = 0.957, respectively).
Table 1
Genotype and allele frequency of the R213R polymorphism in patients and controls
Group
Genotype
Allele
AA
AG
GG
A
G
Controls (n = 100)
96 (0.960)
4 (0.040)
0 (0.00)
196 (0.980)
4 (0.02)
Patients (n = 35)
33 (0.943)
2 (0.057)
0 (0.00)
68 (0.971)
2 (0.028)
The two patients presenting the allele (G) in heterozygosis showed IMC and BE.
These results were compared with literature data and no significant difference was observed among frequencies of the polymorphic allele (P = 0.978) (Akar et al. 1999). When comparing with an American population, no significant difference was found, not even in comparison with Afro-American, Caucasian and Hispanic subpopulations within the same study (P = 0.913, P = 0.726, P = 0.736 and P = 0.687, respectively) (NCI).
Figure 1 shows the results of TaqI digestion, highlighting the possible alleles.
Identification of the 13494 g→a (intron 6) polymorphism
In both groups of patients and controls predominance of the allele (G) was observed, with homozygosis found for the polymorphic allele (A) in four individuals from the control group and none in the patient group, as shown in Table 2. Similar to the R213R polymorphism, the frequency analysis of the 13494 g→a polymorphism did not present a significant difference when comparing the patients with the control group for both the genotypic and allelic analysis (P = 0.607 and P = 0.395, respectively).
Table 2
Genotype and allele frequency of the 13494g→a polymorphism in patients and controls
Group
Genotype
Allele
AA
AG
GG
A
G
Controls (n = 100)
4 (0.040)
25 (0.250)
71 (0.710)
33 (0.165)
167 (0.835)
Patients (n = 45)
0 (0.000)
12 (0.267)
33 (0.733)
12 (0.133)
78 (0.867)
The patients that present the polymorphic allele (A) showed esophagitis (4/45), IMC (5/45) and BE (3/45).
When the frequencies found in our population were superimposed over the literature data, a significant difference was noted. The population analyzed in the Akar et al. 1999 study showed a frequency of 0.3 polymorphic alleles, thus differing from the findings in this study, which were 0.165 (P = 0.008).
When comparing to an American population, no significant difference was found, not even in comparison with Afro-American, Caucasian, Hispanic and Pacific Coast subpopulations within the same study (P = 0.928, P = 0.404, P = 0.467 and P = 0.723, respectively) (Shaheen and Ransohoff 2002).
Figure 1 shows the result of MspI digestion, highlighting the possible alleles.
Loss of heterozygosity
The analysis consisted in pairs of blood and tissue samples from the same patient.
One case of LOH (4.0%), out of two heterozygous samples analyzed, was found for the R213R polymorphism, a patient carrying BE. For the 13494 g→a polymorphism, LOH was confirmed in two patients (7.4%), a carrier of esophagitis and another one BE. The polymorphic allele present in the peripheral blood sample was not kept in the tissues of these two patients, confirming the stress in such tissues even when the wild allele was preserved.
Haplotype analysis for the R213R, 13494 g→a and R72P polymorphisms
The R213R and 13494 g→a polymorphisms were jointly analyzed with the R27P polymorphism, previously reported by us using the same group of patients (Leistner-Segal et al. 2006). Analysis consisted of 26 patients for the three polymorphisms collectively. The genotypic patterns obtained are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Haplotype analysis involving R213R, 13494 g→a and R72P polymorphisms of TP53
Patient
R213R
13494 g→a
R72P
Histological type
Case 1
AA
GG
PR
BE
Case 2
AA
AG
RR
BE
Case 3
AA
AG
RR
BE
Case 4
AA
GG
PR
BE
Case 5
AA
AG
PR
IMC
Case 6
AA
GG
PR
ESOPHAGITIS
Case 7
AA
AG
RR
ESOPHAGITIS
Case 8
AA
GG
RR
IMC
Case 9
AA
GG
RR
BE
Case 10
AA
GG
RR
IMC
Case 11
AA
GG
PR
BE
Case 12
AA
GG
PR
BE
Case 13
AA
AG
PR
IMC
Case 14
AA
GG
RR
ESOPHAGITIS
Case 15
AA
AG
PR
IMC
Case 16
AA
GG
RR
IMC
Case 17
AG
AG
PR
BE
Case 18
AA
GG
RR
BE
Case 19
AG
GG
RR
IMC
Case 20
AA
AG
PP
ESOPHAGITIS
Case 21
AA
GG
RR
ESOPHAGITIS
Case 22
AA
GG
RR
IMC
Case 23
AA
GG
RR
BE
Case 24
AA
GG
PR
BE
Case 25
AA
GG
PR
IMC
Case 26
AA
GG
PR
BE
IMC: intestinal metaplasia of cardia, BE: Barrett´s Esophagus
The analysis demonstrates the conserved haplotype [AA, GG, RR] for the three polymorphisms. The alleles present in the previous haplotype are the most frequent in the general population, except for the R72P polymorphism that in the previous analysis carried out by our group showed predominance of the PR genotype.
In the allele frequency analysis there were no significant difference between the three histological types (esophagitis, IMC and BE) for none of the polymorphisms, R213R, 13494 g→a and R72P (P = 0.7600, P = 0.8438 and P = 0.8557, respectively).
Discussion
The loss of cell cycle control and the progression to cancer in TP53 events in exons 5–8 are already well established. The functional significance and the frequency of polymorphisms in these regions still remain unknown. It is believed that they may contribute to a higher susceptibility (or resistance) to developing cancer (Vos et al. 2003).
A consistent association between these polymorphisms and several types of human neoplasias may serve as argument supporting such sites as susceptibility determiners (IARC). Furthermore, mutations in flanking regions of these exons are probably rare in spite of the biological significance they present.
The genes involved with tumor genesis are potential molecular markers associated to susceptibility to cancer. We thus investigated the relationship linking the R213R and 13494 g→a polymorphisms of the p53 gene and the premalignant esophageal alterations (esophagitis, IMC and BE). Also, countless studies indicate an association between the R72P polymorphism at exon 4 of TP53 and the increased risk of developing neoplasias (Malcolm et al. 2000; Gottschlich et al. 2000; Nakano et al. 2000; Lacerda et al. 2005). Hence, we also carried out a joint analysis of the three polymorphisms described by means of a haplotype.
In the present study the genotypic distribution of the R213R and 13494 g→a polymorphisms are in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the patient group as well as in the control group. The genotypic analysis of both polymorphisms did not present a significantly different allele distribution compared to the control samples, which leads us to conclude that there is no correlation, at these stages, between such molecular findings and the histological types, although a strong ethnic variation with regard to the prevalence of these two polymorphisms (Leistner-Segal et al. 2006, Segal et al. 2004) is known to exist.
While analyzing the R213R polymorphism, Mazars et al. 1992 obtained results similar to ours for ovarian carcinoma and blood bank donor controls with prevalence of 3% and 2.6% for the polymorphic allele, respectively. In the analysis of the 13494 g→a polymorphism for gastrointestinal and breast tumors, Peller et al. 1995 also found results similar to ours, with frequencies of the heterozygous AG genotype of 32% and 68% for homozygous GG genotypes, for the patient group. These results match the allele frequency described by Chumakov and Jenkins 1991, which was 31% for the AG genotype, and 69% for the GG genotype.
It was anticipated that there would be a smaller proportion of the polymorphism in the exon 6 since the coding sequence is more conserved than the intronic region, mainly because the region in which this polymorphism is located carries great importance to the activity of the p53 protein. Eventual differences detected in several studies may be explained by ethnic differences between the groups analyzed (Brenna et al. 2004). Different genetic attributes may bestow protection against or risk for developing cancer in populations of diverse ancestries (Rocha 2005). However, other reasons such as sample size, DNA source, and techniques employed should also be taken into consideration (Brenna et al. 2004).
In the combined analysis with the R72P polymorphism previously studied by our group, a similar frequency was observed in both controls and patients. According to Table 3, the most frequent haplotype was [AA, GG, RR] which occurred in 34.6% of analyzed patients. Since the most frequent haplotype is the same in patient and control groups, we may think again that the absence of association between these three polymorphisms and the esophageal alterations stems from the fact that molecular alterations can only be identified in more advanced stages of the normal tissue-metaplasia-adenocarcinoma progression.
The LOH findings are in agreement with the occurrence of genomic instability seen in various types of cancer, and serve as encouragement to the understanding of DNA repair processes in replication and recombination events (Thiagalingam et al. 2002). All tissue samples presented the wild allele indicating that cells carrying the analyzed polymorphisms were heterozygotic or that many normal cells (lacking polymorphism) were present in the tissue from which DNA was extracted (Campomenosi et al. 1996, Doak et al. 2003). This fact may have minimized the LOH findings in our study.
The allelic loss associated to esophageal carcinogenesis was found by Kawaguchi for the codon 72 polymorphism (Kawaguchi et al. 2000). Abnormalities involving the TP53 are common with esophageal adenocarcinoma and have been detected in pre-malignant tissues surrounding the esophageal cancer (Prevo et al. 1999; Reid et al. 2001). Neshat et al. 1994 reported molecular and genomic alterations identifying LOH in 94% of Barrett cancers and 88% of mutations in the TP53. Allelic loss of 17p has been detected in initial stages of high-degree metaplasia and dysplasia, leading to aneuploidy and suggesting that inactivation of the TP53 is a first step in carcinogenesis. Both cases of LOH located in the intron 6 reinforce the data in literature for these events being found in altered tissues and also highlight the presence of alterations within the non-coding region. Such alterations may alter the phenotype of the protein being coded and are of considerable value in understanding the genic expression.
According to Campomenosi et al. 1996 the association of the molecular findings with the histological type occurs upon development of the BE since the type I metaplasia (common in BE) would be more responsive to damage caused by GERD and therefore more prone to developing aneuploidies than the tissues analyzed in our study (Li et al. 2005). Without doubt, this could provide an explanation to the fact that our results do not differ from those in the control population, since the tissues assayed were in early stages of BE development.
There is increasing evidence that new mechanisms including mutation in splicing sites, introns and promoter regions are involved in the genic expression. Identification of these alterations may help select patients with a higher risk of developing cancer, allowing optimization of treatments (Lacerda et al. 2005).
Considering our data regarding the incidence of alleles, genotypes and haplotypes of the R213R, 13494 g→a and R72P polymorphisms of the p53 gene in patients and controls, we can suggest that these three sites do not represent genetic susceptibility determiners to esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia of the cardia and BE. Additional studies are required in order to investigate these three polymorphisms in advanced stages of carcinogenesis.
Abbreviations
BE:
Barrett’s esophagus
IMC:
intestinal metaplasia of the cardia
TP53:
p53 gene
LOH:
loss of heterozygosity
GERD:
gastroesophageal reflux disease
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work received editorial support from the Research and Postgraduate Group of Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (RS, Brazil) and financial support from the Research Support Foundation of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Research Support Fund/Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (FIPE-HCPA).
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(2)
Serviço de Genética Médica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
(3)
Institute of the Digestive Tract (Instituto do Aparelho Digestivo–IAD)
References
Akar N, Akar E, Cyn P (1999) p53 genes polymorphism in the Turkish population. Turk L Hematol 16(4):187–189Google Scholar
Aldulaimi D, Jankowski J (1999) Barrett’s esophagus: an overview of the molecular biology. Dis Esophagus 12:177–180PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Audrézet MP, Robaszkiewicz M, Mercier B, Nousbaum JB, Hardy E, Bail JP, Volant A, Lozac’h P, Gouérou H, Férec C (1996) Molecular analysis of the TP53 gene in Barrett’s Adenocarcinoma. Hum Mutat 7:109–113PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Baccouche S, Mabrouk I, Said S, Mosbah A, Jlidi R, Gargouri A (2003) A more accurate detection of codon 72 polymorphism and LOH of the TP53 gene. Cancer Lett 189:91–96PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Blount PL, Rabinovitch PS, Haggitt RC, Reid BJ (1990) Barrett´s adenocarcinoma arises within a single aneuploid population. Gastroenterology 98:A273Google Scholar
Brenna SMF, Silva IDCG, Zeferino LC, Prereira JS, Martinez EZ, Syrjänen KJ (2004) Prognostica value of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in invasive cervical cancer in Brazil. Gynecol Oncol 93:374–380PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Campomenosi P, Conio M, Bogliolo M, Urbini S, Assereto P, Aprile A et al (1996) p53 is frequently mutated in Barrett´s metaplasia of intestinal type. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5:559–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
Doak SH, Jenkins GJS, Parry EM, Griffiths AP, Shah V, Baxter JN et al (2003) Characterisation of p53 status at the gene, chromosomal and protein levels in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 89:1729–1735PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Donehower LA, Bradley A (1993) The tumor suppressor p53. Biochim Biophys Acta 1155:181–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald RC (2005) Genetics and prevention of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Recent Results Cancer Res 166:35–46PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gottschlich S, Maune S, Preugschat J, Hoffmann M, Werner JA, Maass JD, Gorogh T, Heidorn K, Rudert H (2000) p53 analysis of laryngeal cancer in exon 4 to 9. Anticancer Res 20(4):2613–2616PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hu N, Roth MJ, Emmert-Buck MR, Tang Z, Polymeropous MQ, Goldstein AM, Han X, Dawsey SM, Ding T, Giffen C, Taylor PR (1999) Allelic loss in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with and without family history of upper gastrointestinaltract cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5:3476–3482PubMedGoogle Scholar
IARC – International Agency for Research no Cancer – TP53 Mutation Database. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/p53/index.html Cited at September 2007
Kawaguchi H, Ohno S, Araki K, Miyzaki M, Saeki H, Watanabe M, Tanaka S, Sugimachi K (2000) p53 Polymorphism in human papillomavirus-associated esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 60:2753–2755PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lacerda LL, Serrano SV, Mathes A, Rey JA, Bello MJ, Casartelli C (2005) An intronic variant in the TP53 gene in a Brazilian woman with breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 160:160–163PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Leistner-Segal S, Pilger DA, Kaspary APB, Lopez P, Segal F (2006) The p53 gene R72P polymorphism analysis in patients with Barrett´s Esophagus compared to normal controls. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 170:76–77PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Malcolm EK, Baber GB, Boyd James C, Stoler MH (2000) Polymorphism at codon 72 of p53 is not associated with cervical cancer risk. Mod Pathol. 13(4):373–378PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mazars GR, Jeanteur P, Lynch HT, Lenoir G, Theillet C (1992) Necleotide sequence polymorphirsm in a hotspot mutation region of the p53 gene. Oncogene 7(4):781–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
Miller SA, Dikes DD, Polensky HF (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nuclei Acids Res 16(7): 1215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nakano Y, Naoe T, Kiyoi H, Kunishima S, Minami S, Miyawaki S, Asou N, Kuriyama K., Saito H, Ohno R (2000) Poor clinical significance of p53 gene polymorphism in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 24(4):349–352PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
NCI - National Cancer Institute. http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov/snp.cfm, Cited at September, 2007Google Scholar
Neshat K, Sanchez CA, Galipeau PC (1994) Barrett´s esophagus: a model of human neoplastic progression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 59:577–583PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Olschwang S, Laurent-Puig P, Vassal A, Salmon R, Thomas G (1991) Characterization of a frequent polymorphism in the coding sequence of the TP53 gene in colonic cancer patients and a control population. Hum Genet 86:369–370PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Peller S, Kolipova Y, Slutzki S, Halevy A, Kvitko K, Rotter V (1995) A novel polymorphism in intron 6 of the human p53 gene: a possible association with cancer predisposition and susceptibility. DNA Cell Biol 14(12):983–990PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Prevo LJ, Sanchez CA, Galipeau PC, Reid BJ (1999) P53–mutant clones and field effects in Barrett´s Esophagus. Cancer Res 59:4784–4787PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rabinovitch PS, Reid BJ, Haggitt RC, Norwood TH, Rubin CE (1989) Progression to cancer in Barrett´s esophagus is associated with genomis instability. Lab Invest 60:65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
Reid B, Prevo LJ, Galipeau PC, Sanchez CA, Longton G, Levine DS et al (2001) Predictors of progression in Barrett´s Esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression. Am J Gastroenterol 96(10):2839–2848PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Reid BJ, Blount PL, Rubin CE, Levine CS, Haggitt RC, Rabinovitch PS (1992) Flow-cytometry and histological progression to malignancy in Barrett´s esophagus: prospective endoscipic surveillance of a cohort. Gastroenterology 102:1212–1219PubMedGoogle Scholar
Reid BJ, Haggitt RC, Rubin CE, Rabinovitch PS (1987) Barrett´s esophagus. Correlation between flow cytometry and histology in detection of patients at risk for adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 93:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rocha AP (2005) Avaliação de polimorfismos no proto-oncogene Ret em pacientes com carcinoma medular de tireóide. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
Segal F, Kaspary APB, Prolla JC, Leistner S (2004) p53 overexpression and p53 mutation analysis in patients with intestinal metaplasia of the cardia and Barrett´s Esophagus. Cancer Lett 210:213–218PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shaheen N, Ransohoff D (2002) Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett´s Esophagus and esophageal cancer. JAMA 287(15):1972–1981PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Soulitzis N, Sourvinos G, Dokianakis DN, Spandios DA (2002) P53 codon 72 polymorphism and association with bladder cancer. Cancer Lett 179:175–183PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Soussi T (1996) The p53 tumour suppressor gene: a model for molecular epidemiology of human cancer. Mol Med Today 2(1):32–37PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Thiagalingam S, Foy RL, Cheng KH, Lee HJ, Thiagalingam A, Ponte JF (2002) Loss of heterozygosity as a predictor to map tumor supressor genes in cancer: molecular basis of its occurrence. Curr Opin Oncol 14:65–72PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vos M, Adams CH, Victor TC, van Helden PD (2003) Polymorphisms and mutations found in the regions flanking exons 5 to 8 of the TP53 gene in a population at high risk for esophageal cancer in South Africa. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 140:20–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
NCBI – National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH – National Institutes of Health, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Cited at 02 Apr 2007Google Scholar
